Allow me to add my two cents to the situation.
In return, I would like you to subtract the rhetoric
That exits your lips
And assist me in keeping divisions from multiplying.
Before I go off on a tangent,
Let me tell you about the problem I have evaluated.
You see, it seems as if every move you make is calculated.

I have tried to mind my Ps and Qs regarding this issue,
But I can not help myself from arriving at the solution
That your ego-induced pollution
Is planned out like a logic proof
Or an algebraic matrix
Or a quadratic equation
Or a manic locomotive.

From Day 1, I was able to graph the main points in my brain
To the axes labeled "X" and "Y".
"X" signifies your attempts to censor others.
"Y," because you can.
My rage is the product of your strategy to further an agenda.
It is merely a fraction of this anger being portrayed.
That's right, just a percentage.
Your position on the number scale of aggravation
Can not be located with mortal eyes.
It stretches out to an infinite number of miles.
There is no final integer.

You see, a range of things bother an depress me,
And my mood not only swings
Like a pendulum in a grandfather clock,
But also descends and ascends like a parabola.
Therefore, I must dig within my brain
And use prior knowledge obtained
To plot the path across the map
On the way to a poem marked with a black "X".
For the most part, I think I do a damn good job at getting From "A"
To "B"…
WITHOUT the help of a tutor.
I am comfortable with what I know
And I embrace it.
Whatever "knowledge" I may lack is on me,
But I know
That you don't know squat
If you think you know
What little I know.
Do you think I care?
HELL NO!

I mean not for this writing to encompass a circular argument,
But like a 180º angle,
Let's get something straight
And settle this score.
I am neither a letter nor a number nor a remedial student.
I am just a man with a voice
That some may consider noise that triggers violent waves.
That is my right.

Aren't we supposed to be equal?
Shouldn't symbols resembling more than and less than
Not be applied or be crossed out?
Can't we eliminate all unnecessary variables.
All unnecessary formulas?
All unnecessary postulates?
All unnecessary theorems?
All unnecessary programs?
Diagrams?
Anagrams?
Acrostics?
Diagnostics?
Cross multiples?

This long division has gone on for too long,
Repeating multiple times like 1/3 written as a decimal.
Statistics do not reject this claim,
Although some want it to be a syntax error
Or want to believe T
That I forgot to carry the "2" in my calculation,
But the remainder of my tolerance
Hangs by an unraveling thread.
I proudly sign my name on this thesis
And by colleagues would proudly cosign,
Given that they possess research on this behavior,
So we pooled our data together.
We share a very reciprocal relationship.

However, it does not take Fibbonacci
Or Pascal
Or Appolonius
Or Euclid
Or Euler
Or Erastophanes
Or Archimedes
Or Maimonides
Or Gematriya
Or even the Nation of Islam to deduce this verbal dilemma.

Your calculations are wrong.
The atmosphere provided is negative.
The agenda can not be defined,
For it does not compute.
Not by any means.
Not by any modes.
Not by any standard deviations.
How do you like those applications?

If you [Log In] as a member you can discuss this work with others